Morality Is Objective Moral Theory - 962 Words

Observations I accept both observations given. P1: Morality is Objective. I demonstrated in my opening argument that Utilitarianism operates under the premise that morality is objective. This means it is not based on personal preference or belief. I even provided a source to affirm this fact of objectivity. (1) Famous’ first contention is that normative ethics are subjective and thus cannot be used to affirm objectivity. This is entirely untrue. It is worth noting that he provides no source to back this claim up. Likely because no such sources exists. Normative ethics â€Å"rest on principles that determine whether an action is right or wrong.† (2) Utilitarianism is an objective moral theory. The second contention raised against this premise was that I have not provided a clear framework. I am beginning to wonder if famous really read my arguments. I provided a clear framework of what morality is i.e. the greatest happiness principle. I am not sure what my opponent finds unclear as he did not offer any indication or detail to this contention. To be thorough I will expound the happiness principle. John Stuart Mill in his book â€Å"Utilitarianism† explained it like this. â€Å"The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness,Show MoreRelatedA World Without Morality By Sezlyn Petersen Essay982 Words   |  4 PagesA World without Morality by Sezlyn Petersen In this paper, I will discuss Error Theory Nihilism and it’s relation to Moral Abolitionism. According to Richard T. Garner, the world would be a better place if we abolished morality by eradicating all objective moral truths. This means that the morals and values I’ve heard all throughout my life would become non-existent, and suggests that people should live their life without identifying things as right and wrong. However, this way of thinking isRead MoreDivine Command Theory Case Study1003 Words   |  5 Pages1. What is divine command theory? What is the Euthypro problem with divine command theory? Does it prove divine command theory false? Why? Divine command theory talks about morality that comes from God, Morality and God’s will are the same thing. This basically means that God has created right and wrong, and without God, there would be no such thing as right and wrong. So for example, murder is wrong because God does not like it; an action is right if and only if God commands it, or God likes itRead MoreThe Necessity For Objective Morality1600 Words   |  7 PagesMorality is a key component to every day life, and due to its large impact on the world, it is often a major topic of discussion and argument. Some people may infer that morality is nothing more than an individual concept, while others, like me, believe it cannot be altered for personal benefit. Accordingly, in this paper I will argue the necessity for objective morality, and furthermore, how if it happened to be objective, the world would be chaotic. While I understand that there are various situationsRead MoreMoral Judgements And Moral Values Essay13 72 Words   |  6 PagesObjective moral values obtain the idea that a certain system of ethics or even a set of moral judgements is not just true according to a person’s subjective opinion, but proves factually true. They are qualities like love or kindness which are morally good independent of the belief of human beings. The other side of the equation refers to subjective moral values which means that values are whatever we as humans choose to pursue and whatever we desire. Now, whether morality is an objective propertyRead MoreEthical Approaches Critique Paper1118 Words   |  5 PagesDamon’s Four Dimensions of Business Morality, and Hill’s (2008) Christian Ethic for Business. Also, this paper critiques each of them through analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of approaches. Finally, the most favor approach is provided at the end. The Grand Principles which are called the prescriptive approach are provided by some philosophers such as Kant and Aristotle. The Grand Principles include Consequentialist Theories, Deontological Theories, and Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics. FirstlyRead MoreCultural Relativism And Its Impact On Society1437 Words   |  6 Pagescultures, is used as a scientific tool to help anthropologists be objective when studying other cultures. Cultural Relativism is the belief that morality, or the way we ought to live, is solely a matter of cultural perspective and we ought not to judge other people based on their societies customs and beliefs. This moral theory is very attractive because it simplifies the ideas of what is right and wrong: it suggests that morality exists, yet differs from culture to culture, and many of people sRead MoreKant: Moral Theories1002 Words   |  5 PagesKants moral theory According to Timmons, the field of philosophy is not complete without the mention of Kant whose contributions were major (205). This, he adds, was influenced by his originality, subtle approach and the difficulty of his works. Timmons cites that moral requirements are a requirement of reason, which is the ideology of Kant’s Moral theory; hence, immoral act is an act against reason. Consequently, speaking on the terminologies of Kant we visualize moral requirements as CategoricalRead MoreThe Basic Principles Of Morality889 Words   |  4 Pages Morality in philosophy pursues to obtain a standardized understanding of the nature and what it expects from us. Philosopher, Socrates defines morality â€Å"how we ought to live† and the motives behind these systematic understandings(Rachels 1). The two basic principles of morality are impartiality and reason. Moral judgments must be supported by legitimate reasons and requires the impartial thought of each individual’s interest. Reason and impartially form the minimum conception of morality. EachRead MoreThe Moral Argument1723 Words   |  7 PagesTHE MORAL ARGUMENT How do we explain the fact that people often refrain from immoral acts even when there is no risk of their being caught? There are many formulations of the moral argument but they all have as their starting point the phenomenon (fact) of moral conscience. In essence the moral argument poses the question: where does our conscience, our sense of morality come from if not from God? It also asserts that if we accept the existence of objective moral laws we must accept the existenceRead MoreLiving Morally Is Important And Essential To Enacting Moral1245 Words   |  5 Pagesessential to enacting moral decisions in every facet of life. Immanuel Kant created three maxims that emphasize stringent moral duties that every human must adhere to in order to be as morally perfect as possible. Conversely, Susan Wolf argues that morality is fundamentally achieved through a unification in rational and flexible moderation. Wolf further exclaims that being too moral would diminish other qualities necessary to lead a full moral life. Following absolute moral duties or a â€Å"code,† may